Why Do Methodists Sprinkle? Sprinkling vs Immersion in Methodist Baptism



  • The United Methodist Church accepts sprinkling, pouring and immersion, and its glossary says “the most common method in recent years has been sprinkling.”
  • Methodists teach that “it is God’s grace that makes the sacrament whole,” so the amount of water does not decide whether a baptism is valid.
  • Any Methodist may ask to be immersed, and the Global Methodist and African Methodist Episcopal churches also allow all three methods.
  • Sprinkling is aspersion, pouring is affusion and immersion is dipping; affusion does not mean sprinkling.
  • John Wesley baptized an eleven-day-old girl by immersion in Georgia in 1736, but his 1784 service book for American Methodists let ministers “dip it in the Water, or sprinkle it therewith.”
  • Methodists do not rebaptize anyone baptized with water in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, whatever the method; instead they offer a reaffirmation of baptismal vows, with the words “Remember your baptism and be thankful.”

United Methodists usually sprinkle. Their church teaches that God’s grace, not the amount of water, makes a baptism, and it baptizes babies at a font inside the church, where a little water is enough. It accepts sprinkling, pouring and immersion as equally valid, and any member may ask to be immersed. What it will not do is baptize anyone twice.

The church’s own glossary says that “a candidate for Holy Baptism or his sponsors may choose any of the traditional ways baptism is administered: sprinkling, pouring, or immersion,” and adds that “the most common method in recent years has been sprinkling.” So sprinkling is the custom of most congregations, but no Methodist rule requires it. Behind the custom is a conviction about who does the work in baptism. Methodists believe it is God, and a few drops at a font are as much in his hands as a river.

Do Methodists ever baptize by immersion?

Yes. Immersion is one of the three ways the United Methodist Church names, and a person being baptized, or the parents and sponsors of a child, may ask for it. Sprinkling and pouring are done at the font near the altar; immersion needs a pool or open water. The church’s own website shows United Methodist pastors from North Georgia baptizing 47 people in a river in Angat, in the Philippines.

In Britain the Methodist Church ties the method to age. Pouring water on the head is “common in the Baptism of children,” it says, and full immersion, where the person “is lowered into a body of water and then brought up again,” is “more common in adult baptisms.”

Two other Methodist churches allow the same three ways. The Global Methodist Church’s Book of Doctrines and Discipline (2024) says that “Holy Baptism may be performed by sprinkling, pouring, or immersion.” For the African Methodist Episcopal Church, the Rev. James A. Keeton Jr. wrote in 2023, in the church’s newspaper The Christian Recorder: “In the AME Church, adults and parents of children have a choice of three methods: immersion, sprinkling, and pouring.”

What do sprinkling, pouring and immersion mean?

They are the three ways of putting water on a person in baptism, and each has an older name that still turns up in church documents and dictionaries:

  • Sprinkling, also called aspersion: the minister sprinkles water on the head.
  • Pouring, also called affusion (older Catholic writing says infusion): the minister pours water over the head, sometimes three times.
  • Immersion, also called dipping or submersion: the person goes under the water, once or three times, and rises from it.

Affusion means pouring, not sprinkling, though the two are often confused. Aspersion has a second, unrelated meaning in English, a damaging remark, as in “to cast aspersions”; in church use it only ever means sprinkling. Whatever the method, the minister says the same words, baptizing the person “in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost” (Matthew 28:19).

Why does the amount of water not matter to Methodists?

Because Methodists believe God is the one who acts in baptism. By Water and the Spirit, the United Methodist statement on baptism adopted in 1996, says: “The power of the Spirit in baptism does not depend upon the mode by which water is administered, the age or psychological disposition of the baptized person, or the character of the minister. It is God’s grace that makes the sacrament whole.”

That does not make baptism a small thing. For Methodists it is a sacrament. John Wesley kept the Church of England’s definition of a sacrament as an “outward sign of inward grace, and a means whereby we receive the same,” and the 1996 statement calls baptism and the Lord’s Supper “special means of grace.” The water still speaks. It “symbolizes cleansing from sin, death to old life, and rising to begin new life in Christ,” the statement says, and it asks that, “however it is administered, water should be utilized with enough generosity to enhance our appreciation of its symbolic meanings.”

Wesley said the same about quantity in his Treatise on Baptism, dated 11 November 1756: “the quantity of water used was not material: no more than the quantity of bread and wine in the Lord’s supper.” A small piece of bread is still the Lord’s Supper. A little water is still baptism.

One United Methodist worship leader has argued for more water rather than less. Taylor Burton-Edwards, writing as director of worship resources at the church’s General Board of Discipleship, noted “an emerging ecumenical consensus based on early Christian practice” that baptism “should normally be administered with flowing water in some form, whether in an immersion pool or by pouring over a font,” and that “practices using only small amounts of water (droplets via sprinkling) should be discouraged.” He wanted baptism to look clearly different from the services that remember it. A sprinkled baptism is still a full baptism.

Where did the Methodist practice come from?

From what the 1996 statement calls Wesley’s “Anglican heritage.” The Church of England’s Book of Common Prayer of 1662 tells the priest to take the child and “dip it in the Water discreetly and warily,” and adds: “But if they certify that the Child is weak, it shall suffice to pour Water upon it.”

As a clergyman in the colony of Georgia, Wesley kept that rule to the letter. His Journal for 21 February 1736 records: “Mary Welch, aged eleven days, was baptized according to the custom of the first Church, and the rule of the Church of England, by immersion.” On 5 May 1736 a mother in Savannah told him that she and her husband would not “consent to its being dipped.” Wesley answered that if they would certify the child was weak, pouring would do. She refused, and someone else baptized the child. The town did not forget. The next year the Savannah grand jury listed it among its complaints against him: “refusing to baptize Mr. Parker’s child, otherwise than by dipping, except the parents would certify it was weak, and not able to bear it.”

Twenty years later Wesley wrote that the mode was open. Baptism, his Treatise says, may be done “by washing, dipping, or sprinkling the person,” because “it is not determined in scripture, in which of these ways it shall be done.” In 1784 he prepared a service book for the Methodists in America, The Sunday Service of the Methodists in North America. Its rite for infants told the minister to “dip it in the Water, or sprinkle it therewith.” For adults it said “dip him in the Water, or pour Water upon him.” Sprinkling had become a lawful choice for babies, and in time it became the usual one.

Is sprinkling biblical?

Methodists say Scripture does not settle how much water to use. Baptists say it does. The Baptist Faith and Message defines Christian baptism as “the immersion of a believer in water in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit,” an act “symbolizing the believer’s faith in a crucified, buried, and risen Saviour, the believer’s death to sin, the burial of the old life, and the resurrection to walk in newness of life in Christ Jesus.” Among the passages it cites are the baptism of Jesus in the Jordan, “And straightway coming up out of the water, he saw the heavens opened” (Mark 1:10); John baptizing at Aenon “because there was much water there” (John 3:23); and Philip and the eunuch, who “went down both into the water,” and then “were come up out of the water” (Acts 8:38–39).

It also cites Paul, who speaks of baptism as a burial and a rising: “Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death? Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life” (Romans 6:3–4). He says it again in Colossians: “Buried with him in baptism, wherein also ye are risen with him through the faith of the operation of God, who hath raised him from the dead” (Colossians 2:12). The Catholic Catechism, from another tradition, gives the word’s meaning the same way: to baptize, in Greek baptizein, means to “plunge” or “immerse.”

Methodists read the same verses and keep the picture, whatever the method. A United Methodist guide puts it this way: “Going into the water signifies dying to our old selves, and rising from the water our new life in Christ.” Sprinkling draws on another picture, of cleansing. God promised through Ezekiel: “Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you, and ye shall be clean: from all your filthiness, and from all your idols, will I cleanse you” (Ezekiel 36:25). The letter to the Hebrews speaks of “having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience, and our bodies washed with pure water” (Hebrews 10:22).

Wesley argued that the word also meant washing. Where the King James Version has “the washing of cups, and pots” (Mark 7:4), the original, he noted, speaks of their baptisms, and cups are not always dipped to be washed. He argued from the scenes in Acts too. The jailer at Philippi “was baptized, he and all his, straightway” in the middle of the night (Acts 16:33), and Wesley thought it unlikely that every such household had a pond or river at hand. Readers who favour immersion answer that the jailer had first “brought them out” (Acts 16:30) and only afterwards “brought them into his house” (Acts 16:34), so the baptism need not have happened indoors. Wesley’s conclusion was that “the manner of baptizing (whether by dipping or sprinkling) is not determined in scripture.”

Early Christian practice favoured plenty of water and allowed less. The Didache, an early church manual also called the Teaching of the Twelve Apostles, asks for baptism “in living (running) water,” then in other water, and, if there is not enough of either, says: “pour water on the head thrice in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.” The Catholic Encyclopedia of 1907 says that “the most ancient form usually employed was unquestionably immersion,” and that pouring or sprinkling was so commonly used for those too ill to be immersed that it was called “the baptism of the sick.”

Which churches sprinkle, pour or immerse?

Baptist churches, which baptize only believers, immerse. Churches that baptize babies differ: some sprinkle or pour, some immerse, and some allow either.

Church Ways it baptizes Source
United Methodist Sprinkling, pouring or immersion By Water and the Spirit (1996)
Global Methodist Sprinkling, pouring or immersion Book of Doctrines and Discipline (2024)
African Methodist Episcopal Immersion, sprinkling or pouring Keeton, The Christian Recorder (2023)
Presbyterian Pouring or sprinkling; dipping not required Westminster Confession 28.3
Anglican (1662 Prayer Book) Dipping; pouring for a weak child Book of Common Prayer
Catholic Triple immersion or pouring three times Catechism 1239
Eastern Orthodox Three immersions Greek Orthodox Archdiocese
Southern Baptist Immersion only Baptist Faith and Message 2000

Presbyterians, who also baptize babies, write the permission into their confession. The Westminster Confession says: “Dipping of the person into the water is not necessary; but baptism is rightly administered by pouring, or sprinkling water upon the person.” The Catholic Catechism holds that “baptism is performed in the most expressive way by triple immersion in the baptismal water,” but that “from ancient times it has also been able to be conferred by pouring the water three times over the candidate’s head.” Baptists define baptism as “the immersion of a believer in water,” so for them the method and the meaning cannot be separated; Methodist vs Baptist sets out that difference.

Do Methodists baptize babies?

Yes, and that is a large part of why sprinkling became usual. The Methodist Articles of Religion say: “The Baptism of young children is to be retained in the Church.” By Water and the Spirit quotes the Book of Discipline: “the pastor of each charge shall earnestly exhort all Christian parents or guardians to present their children to the Lord in Baptism at an early age.” It is plain, too, about what the church rejects: it “does not accept either the idea that only believer’s baptism is valid or the notion that the baptism of infants magically imparts salvation apart from active personal faith.”

Methodists point to the households baptized in Acts. The Global Methodist Discipline adds that circumcision, the sign of God’s covenant with Israel, was given to baby boys, and reads Colossians 2:11–12 as joining circumcision and baptism. An infant’s baptism is sometimes called a christening; the Methodist Church in Britain calls the word “simply another name for Baptism,” as baptism vs christening explains. A dedication is something else. By Water and the Spirit draws the line: “in a dedication we make a gift of a life to God for God to accept, while in a sacrament God offers the gift of God’s unfailing grace for us to accept.”

What happens at a Methodist baptism?

It takes place in worship, before the congregation. The person being baptized, or the parents and sponsors of a child, profess the faith; the candidate answers “I do” to the question “Do you confess Jesus Christ as your Savior, put your whole trust in his grace, and promise to serve him as your Lord.” The congregation, in the words of the 1996 statement, “pledges to act as spiritual mentor and support for the one who is baptized.” Then “water is administered in the name of the triune God (specified in the ritual as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit) by an authorized person, and the Holy Spirit is invoked with the laying on of hands in the presence of the congregation.” The water is sprinkled or poured, or the candidate goes under it. A child baptized as a baby makes those promises in his or her own voice later, at confirmation.

Preparation comes first. For a baby, the 1996 statement asks for “instruction prior to baptism of parent(s) or sponsors in the gospel message, the meaning of the sacrament, and the responsibilities of a Christian home,” and it says that “adults who are candidates for baptism need careful preparation.” If you are preparing for your own baptism, reaffirming it, or preparing for a child’s, Baptism and First Steps is a free course of six short lessons, one of them on how different churches baptize.

Can a Methodist baptized as a baby be baptized again by immersion?

No. Methodists teach that baptism is given once, because it is first God’s act and rests on God’s faithfulness, not on how well we keep our promises. “Does it matter how I was baptized, whether by immersion, pouring, or sprinkling?” the United Methodist Church asks, and answers: “No. What matters is that you were baptized in water in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit by someone authorized to do so.” It adds: “We do not re-baptize those who have already received Christian baptism.” That includes a baptism given in another church.

The Global Methodist Church says baptism “occurs once in a person’s life.” The African Methodist Episcopal Church’s Doctrine and Discipline also forbids its ministers to rebaptize anyone, according to Keeton’s 2026 article in The Christian Recorder.

What Methodists offer instead is reaffirmation. By Water and the Spirit says that a conversion, a return to faith or a new calling calls “not for repetition of baptism, but for reaffirmations of baptismal vows,” and names the services “Confirmation or Reaffirmation of Faith” and “A Celebration of New Beginnings in Faith.” It also calls Baptismal Covenant IV, in the United Methodist Hymnal, “a powerful ritual of reaffirmation which uses water in ways that remind us of our baptism.” Water is used there, but “in ways that cannot be interpreted as baptism.” People may be invited to come to the font and use the water themselves: some touch it and make the sign of the cross, others pour it over their own heads. However the water is used, it points back to the one baptism already given, and the pastor’s words say what to do with it: “Remember your baptism and be thankful.”





Response

  1. kenneth d Mckissack Avatar
    kenneth d Mckissack

    Unless I missed it, I see no Bible scripture reference as to the sprinkle form of baptism.

Leave a Reply

Share to...